Sunday, August 16, 2009

I Support Whole Foods on Healthcare

As some may know, John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Markets recently wrote an editorial for the Wall Street Journal on health care. Since it does not endorse President Obama's plan, in fact, it calls for less government involvement and for individual empowerment, many on the left have called for a boycott. And some from the other side are calling for us to support Whole Foods. Lets consider the post by the Moderate Voice, which doesn't seem very moderate.
Whole Foods CEO John Mackey shot his company in the face the other day with an anti-health care op-ed screed in the Wall Street Journal.
Now, nothing in the editorial is anti-health care. Nor does it fit the definition of screed. Other than the call for tort reform, none of Mackey's bulleted proposals should have any objection from anybody. He calls for more transparency, more competition, and more tax equality, along with fiscal responsibility. Please, find something to object to there.

Another leftist blogger characterizes the post as

"he argues for insurance industry deregulation and a shrinking of the Medicare program".

Please, read the editorial. Technically, he does call for less regulation, so as to reduce the influence of industry lobbyists and increase competition. He calls for "reform" of Medicare, since it heading towards bankruptcy. Does this make him a shill for Newt Gingrich or the dreaded "drug companies"? No. These harsh and over the top reactions from the left are reminiscent of the "death panel" claims by the right. Both have a very feeble grasp of reality.

Mackey then calls for Americans to take some responsibility.
we need to address the root causes of poor health. This begins with the realization that every American adult is responsible for his or her own health.

Unfortunately many of our health-care problems are self-inflicted: two-thirds of Americans are now overweight and one-third are obese. Most of the diseases that kill us and account for about 70% of all health-care spending—heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes and obesity—are mostly preventable through proper diet, exercise, not smoking, minimal alcohol consumption and other healthy lifestyle choices.


In conclusion, I'd like to quote most of a comment by Desider on Open Left.
Thank you for letting me know (4.00 / 1)
that you folks are a bunch of intolerant idiots.

What did this guy say so horribly?

That boomers are retiring, so fewer workers will be paying in while our deficits go up, so we need to cut the cost of entitlements, not increase them, especially for Medicare. [If we pay twice as much as other countries per capita, as Bob Somerby of Daily Howler keeps pointing out, shouldn't health insurance reform bring some of the costs in check, not increase them?]

That his company gets low insurance rates by going with high deductibles, and uses Wellness Accounts to roll over savings for the employees. [I use high deductibles myself, since I've gone more than a decade without seeing a doctor].

Make personal insurance tax deductible like corporate already is. Good idea, no?

Allow insurance competition across state lines. [Making insurance companies competitive, more responsive to customers and lower cost is a good thing, no?]

Make costs of treatment transparent. [Kinda obvious?]

He notes that at Whole Foods employees vote on what they want company health insurance to fund. [Workers' rights?]

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Hi,

I was, and remain, perplexed by this controversy. A rich capitalist writes an editorial in the Wall Street Journal calling for more capitalism in health care reform. Maybe he has a case, maybe he doesn't. Certainly the idea that a rich entrepreneur believes in capitalism is not amazing, nor is it particularly remarkable that the Wall Street Journal supports more capitalism.

The only conclusion I came to was that a lot of the liberals and progressives who shop at Whole Foods didn't know that the owner of Whole Foods doesn't agree with them. They weren't too happy when they found out. I think boycotting Whole Foods because its owner wrote something is kind of stupid myself. If you're gonna boycott someone's company, look for someone who has done something really bad {there's enough of them around}.

On the other hand, England and France have very different systems of health care finance and they both get better results for less money per capita. Obamacare is more modeled on Switzerland, which also does better than we do. None of these countries rely on the principles of capitalism to finance health care. There are some obvious problems with relying on capitalism in health care. So frankly I would much rather just copy what seems to work in England or France than try to invent a wonderful, totally new, system.

So I don't agree with the guy, but frankly have no idea what the fuss is about.

Ray,